38 thoughts on “GOD the FATHER AND HIS SON JESUS-YESHUA is I AM THAT I AM AMEN-AMEIN!!”

1. Welcome to my Sukkah: An interpretation of the 13 tohor middot

   Throughout the year after we say the opening p’suk of ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא Israel has the established custom to whisper ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעוךם ועד. But on Yom Kippur the custom practiced by the Cohen nation to cry aloud ‘ברוך שם כבוד וכו. Before the דם חיי sprinkled 7 times before the פרכת, (the k’vanna of Yom Kippur) which starkly contrasts with the goat dedicated to עזאזל; the serving Cohen makes a private ודוי for himself and his House, which duplicates the ודוי wherein the scapegoat to עזאזל bears the guilt of the Cohen nation as a whole.

   The 2nd sugya on this 3rd פרק Mishna, frames a מחלקת between rabbi Meir and the Sages. But the critical observation and logical דיוק screams off the dof of :לו comparable to ברוך שם כבוד … The עצם language of the Shemone Esrei lacks any ודוי what so ever. The 3rd Middle Blessing סלח לנו – emphatically aligns with the 3rd middah of the Horev revelation אל — the rebuke wherein the מלאך whom Yaakov wrestled prior to meeting his brother Esav who approached with an Army, according to the Targum of Uziel, numbered 400 Officers! The name ישראל defines the k’vanna of all prophetic prophesies. Prophets command mussar and the seed of Yaacov “grews from generation to generation by remembering prophetic mussar rebukes within our Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts.” The name ישראל defines the entirety of all T’NaCH, Talmudic, Midrash, and Siddur spirituality in that one Name change made by a מלאך.

   The Book of בראשית for the first time introduces the wisdom-time oriented commandment of sending מלאכים as an act of War. Yaacov sent a מלאך to his brother and לשמה sent Moshe as a מלאך to judge the Gods worshipped by Par’o and Egypt. This critical Torah theme defines the k’vanna of the blessing of ברכת כהנים – through the active pursuit of sanctifying wisdom-time oriented commandments that Israel prevails over our hostile enemies as did the Avot by means of wisdom “commandments” – the Avot mitzvot of the Torah revelation at Sinai – these commandments require the k’vanna לשמה – a sanctity of קידושה infinitely higher than תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות which do not by rote definition have any k’vanna.

   However through משנה תורה — בניני אבות a toldot secondary commandment can become an Av wisdom-time oriented commandment; this applies from the toldot commandments contained within the Constitutional Torah text and the Oral Torah codification of common law halachot by means of Aggadic or Midrashic drosh back to T’NaCH בניני אבות mussar אל etc. precedents of T’NaCH common law.

   The dispute between rabbi Meir and the Sages – a יחיד כנגד רבים – dispute. This kind of dispute the Germara brings as a precedent to interpret the language of the Mishna viewed from a fixed perspective. The Mishna has depth which requires פרדס inductive reason to correctly interpret its intent. No different from the 5th Book of the Torah makes a sugya legislative review משנה תורה upon other בניני אבות similar sugyot throughout the other 4 Books of the Torah who share a defined Oral Torah middot מכנה משותף required to add fractions.

   The distinction between the 10-12 ודוי middot from the closing 13th middah – the distinction מאי נפקא מינא – an Aramaic Gemarah term which makes the critical הבדלה (((A verb independent from motza’ei Shabbat; this latter wisdom-time oriented commandment makes a t’rumah from chol distinction between מלאכה vs. עבודה.))),,,[רב חסד] — wisdom which discerns לשמה\חיים from לא לשמה/גלוט מות.

   Compare פרק ראשון ר”ה: בר”ה כל באי עולם עוברין לפניו כבני מרון שנאמר (תהילים לג) היצר יחד לבם המבין אל כל מעשיהם. כנגד פרק שלישי – כל השפרות כשרים חוץ משל פרה The בנין אב which interprets the opening Mishna the distinction between the righteous vs wicked vs a bit of both this and that. The latter type of Jews Yom Kippur seals the din – לפי שאין קטגור נעשה סנגור. Hence the בניני אבות applicable to the Tzaddik not applicable to the wicked. The same ruling equally applies to the distinction between the two goats. Hence Yom Kippur prioritizes the דאורייתא מידות\confession which starts with the distinction from לשמה blessed to לשמה cursed — חיים כנגד מות — ארץ ישראל כנגד גלות.

   Talmudic judicial common law learns by means of precedents. The דם חיי sprinkled upon the פרכת\/כפרה the middot of לשמה לשמה … נצר חסד לאלפים whereas the ודוי places upon the head of the scapegoat, which a person can add within the blessing שמע קולינו, the rabbinic ודוי established by David Daniel and Ezra. The language of the rabbinic confession excluded from the Shemon Esrei like similar the requirement to sanctify a blessing-oath which requires שם ומלכות not found in the opening blessing! Learning requires that the generations of Israel make the logical דיוק; which the kabbalah of RambaN called White Fire and Black Fire in the introduction of his commentary to the Chumash.

   As תהילים employed in the פסוקי דזמרה elevated to the קידושה of a blessing through the ברוך שאמר והיה העולם which “rhetorically” employs שם ומלכות. However rote reading words in the Siddur amounts to a טיפש פשט. Impossible to define an unknow abstract term by using the same term to define itself any more than making ad hominem personal attacks ie Blood libels\unilateral declarations of Jew guilt/\ qualifies as anything other than slander, libel, evil eye, לשון הרע tumah middot spirits which emote from the Yatzir HaRah within the heart.

   The 13th Oral Torah middah has an עין טוב and only declares during the Month of Elul the tohor conclusion. However the din of the wicked equally implied by making the required דיוק. The sages prefer – חטאתי עויתי פשעתי because Jews most essentially existed in g’lut. תעשה תפילתך במקום קבוע where מקום understood as a רמז to השם entails affixing the 13 middle blessings to the 13 Horev middot. Hence the blessing ולמלדינים אל תהי תקוה, this blessing affixes to the wicked such as the Shomronim, the Tzeddukim, the Jews who embrace JeZeus as moshiach, the karaim, and Islam – all of whom declare themselves as the true faith and all of whom rejected the revelation of the Oral Torah middot together with wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which תמיד מעשה בראשית create from nothing מלאכים tohor Jews who rule the conquered land of Canaan send to judge the Gods worshipped by the Goyim.

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply

2. John 15:9-10 KJV and D.L. Moody and more Blessings!!

   D.L. MOODY WAS A GREAT PREACHER FOR OUR LORD ( ADONAI ) AND SAVIOUR JESUS-YESHUA CHRIST ❤

   I am a Devout Conservative Christian-ZIONIST ✝ Republican in our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America USA and I STAND with the HOLY LAND of Israel-Yisrael of Israel!! “Pray Without Ceasing” ( I Thessalonians 5:17 KJV ) For USA and Israel-Yisrael and our Christian Earth Forevermore!!

   May our ONE TRUE GOD THE FATHER who art in Heaven Above Bless all my Sisters and Brothers in Christ Jesus-Yeshua and my Messianic Jewish Sisters and Brothers in Christ Jesus-Yeshua and my Devout Jewish Sisters and Brothers who STAND with the Holy Land of Israel-Yisrael and our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Our Christian Earth!! Sing Glory Glory Hallelujah and Amen!!

   ( Genesis 15:18 KJV ) “In the same day the LORD made a Covenant with Abram ( ABRAHAM ), saying, Unto thy Seed have I Given this Land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:”!! Israel-Yisrael is the SEED of ABRAHAM, ISAAC and JACOB of our HOLY BIBLE KJV and the TORAH!!I UPDATED this POST TODAY on my Website, PLEASE ENJOY EVERYONE!!

   ❤ I UPDATED THIS POST TODAY 9/28/2026 FOR YE ALL ❤

   Happy Shabbat Shalom ( Peaceful Sabbath )  Happy Shavua Tov ( Good Week ) EveryoneShalom ( Peace ) ❤ Everyone ❤ MARANATHA ❤

   ❤ Shalom Aleichem and Mazel Tov Everyone ❤

   MARANATHA-OUR LORD ( ADONAI ) COMETH YE ALL ❤

   I Love ❤ you all Everyone through ❤ Jesus-Yeshua Christ-Messiah ❤ because ❤ HE LOVED ❤ EVERYONE FIRST!!

   Praise ❤ Jesus-Yeshua Christ-Messiah ❤ for Today and Everyday!!

   GOD ❤ BLESS YOU ALL

   Love ❤ Always and Shalom, YSIC ❤

   KRISTI ❤ 1611 AV

   LikeLiked by 2 people

   Reply

3. If you call yourself a Christian or a Jew and don’t support the Jews and the Nation of Israel, you should be ashamed of yourself. Israel-Yisrael is the “Apple of GOD’S EYE”, and the Jews are still  HIS Chosen people

   Neshama ( Hebrew: נשמה ) is a Hebrew Word which can mean “Soul” or “Spirit”!!  ❤ MARANATHA ❤ AMEN ❤ AMEIN ❤

   GOODNIGHT YE ALL YAWN ❤

   MARANATHA-OUR LORD ( ADONAI ) COMETH ❤

   LOVE ❤ ALWAYS AND ❤ SHALOM, YSIC !!

   KRISTI 1611 AV

   LikeLiked by 3 people

   Reply

   • It’s amazing, but there are Jews who are in opposition to Prmie Minister Netanyahu, who is one of the world’s greatest statesmen and Jewish patriots. I guess it’s not so amazing when we consider that there were many Jews who were opposed to the Messiah.

     We are approaching the time when the Holy One of Israel will use enemy nations to sift the natrion of Israel until the only Jews left are those who see their sin in rejecting the Messiah and in anguish call on El Shaddai for the return of the Messiah. When that happens, He will respond instantly and in POWER! And the remnant will be saved by the return of King Jesus, God’s appointed and anointed Messiah. May that day come soon! The entire planet is in pain until it happens.

     Thank You, Heavenly Father, for the Blessed Hope and for the (separate) hope of the return TO earth of King Jesus, Your only begotten Son and Messiah!

     “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” ( Acts 4:12 )

     LikeLiked by 1 person

   • Inductive Case Law (Common Law/Pardes/Middot) vs. Deductive Statute Law (Greek Logic/Shulchan Aruch/Rambam/Qur’anic Literalism); the Hellenization of Jewish Law via the Rambam. Mapping the structural anatomy of Sola Scriptura across three Abrahamic traditions. Munkir al-Hadith (Qur’anism), Karaism, and Protestantism function not merely as “reforms” but as substitute theologies of Av tuma avoda zarah – attempts to collapse the prophetic mussar rebukes which defines the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the hearts of all bnai brit Cohen peoples in all generations.

     Qur’anism/Munkir al-Hadith rejects the Hadith/Sunnah as a binding independent source of law, leaving only the Qur’an.-IS UNHOLY UNGODLY!! Like Karaites, they face the crisis of ambiguity. The Qur’an commands prayer but doesn’t detail the rakat (( a unit of Islamic prayer (Salah) that consists of a sequence of movements and recitations, including standing, bowing, prostration, and sitting)); it commands charity but doesn’t set the nisab ((the minimum amount of wealth a Muslim must possess for one lunar year before being obligated to pay zakat, which is typically set at 87.48 grams of gold or 612.36 grams of silver)). Without Hadith, they must reconstruct these details using either pure linguistic deduction or modernist reasoning—effectively creating a new “oral law” without admitting it.

     Modern Qur’anists divorce Islamic practice from the Hadith’s contextual nuance. Both prioritize a “clean,” accessible code over the messy, living tradition of judicial precedent. The spiritual “addiction” to the heroin of frozen deductive Greek logic has dramatically shaped all communities following the Islamic invasion of Spain. The consequence of defining “law” through Greek and Roman cultural perspectives of Senate Statute law decrees rather than dynamic courtroom legislative review has produced a ירידות הדורות curse upon g’lut Jewry, Islam and Xtianity; perhaps best understood through Universal Monotheism (like Islam’s Tawhid) as the priority of faith over the righteous pursuit of justice as the prime theme of remembering the salvation from Egyptian slavery.

     Historically, Karaites developed a robust system of Ijtihad (independent reasoning) and even adopted some rabbinic customs when logic dictated it. They were not “fundamentalists” in the modern sense; many were rationalists influenced by Islamic Mu’tazila theology. Their rejection of the Oral Law was often driven by the desire to align Judaism with Greco-Islamic rationalism. Sunni Islam, once the four Madhabs closed the “gate of Ijtihad”, Sunni law became statutory.

     Consequently, the Munkir al-Hadith qualify (so to speak) as the “Protestants” of Islam, trying to reopen the gate by removing the intermediary (Hadith), but they often end up relying on secular academic linguistics or Sufi mysticism to fill the gaps—creating a new “Magisterium” of intellectuals. Most classical Karaites and early Qur’anists contrast with the Xtian religious literalism, for a spell their hyper-intellectualism dominated the World. They valued grammar, philosophy, and science more than the traditionalists, whom they saw as superstitious. Then came the horrors of Nakba Allah, the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate. Which fell to the Mongol hordes under Hulagu Khan. Baghdad was captured and sacked in 1258, ending the Abbasid Caliphate’s political rule. The consequence of this Nakba Allah disaster – witnessed the rise of modern Salafi-Jihadi literalism which inevitably flattens judicial common law courts unto belief-system religions which prioritize text-bound, universal, religious/philosophical codifications.

     A Munkir al-Hadith/Qur’anist resembles to a biblical primitivist, fundamentalist, or certain forms of Protestant scripturalism: the aim or objective: a simplified trust in “the Word” literalism. منكر الحديث compares to the Protestant revolt which rejected Orthodox and/or Catholic church Papel autocracy…Sunni tradition. The Shiite revolt consequent to the murder of Ali inclusive with Sunni because it too, akin to the Karaism revolt against the religification of the Talmud which manifested by Orthodox Judaism’s religious codifications of Talmudic judicial common law Mishnaic and Gemara texts into statute law halachic codifications which culminated in the Shulkan Aruch.

     For example: the Karaism houses rejected not the mezuzah but rather the parchments placed inside the mezuzah; they rejected the Talmudic mussar which teaches that Israel only accepted the first two Sinai commandments before demanding from Moshe that he go up Sinai and receive the rest of the Torah. That the repetition of the so-called Ten Commandments represents a משל which requires its נמשל; they reject that prophets command only mussar; that for example the 6th Oral Torah middah ערך אפים remembers Torah precedents as mussar rather than literal historical accounts such as the 10 generations which separate Adam from Noach from Avram etc or the literal Creation of the Universe as depicted in בראשית; they reject t’shuva as remembering the oaths which the Avot swore לשמה that only they would father the chosen Cohen nation. Hence, never actually 10 commandments but rather 10 times Israel tested faith as recorded in the mussar touching the Wilderness generation … that this reference of 10 mussar defines the repetition of the so-called 10 commandments.

     Hadith compares to the Karaim requirement of Jewish “literalism” in how this belief system understands Jewish internal jurisprudence – based upon the premise that the Torah represents Divine Law – akin to the Protestant “Sola Scriptura” movement. Therefore the Munkir al-Hadith, primarily a theological doctrinal description closer to “Qur’an-only” or Islamic sola scriptura; Muhammad’s role as messenger who delivers the Qur’an from later reports attributed to him inclusive of Hadith “additions” more akin to the Toseftot to the Mishna.

     According to JSTOR digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources – modern Qur’anism associates with the cultural assimilation or democratization of religious interpretation; with educated laypeople claiming direct access to the Qur’an rather than submitting to inherited scholarly authority. Both
     Karaites and Qur’anists rely more than simply exclaim public declaration for the words of the Bible – akin to the famous Monkey Trial in the 20th Century.

     Both perverse sects rejected one interpretive tradition such as פרדס-middot of inductive logical reason with some “other” interpretive tradition. Such as grammarians, or assimilated Jews of Spain whose “Orthodox” rabbis embraced as did the Tzeddukim some 1000 years earlier ancient Greek deductive logical reasoning. The most famous Spanish rabbi of this Reshonim Era, clearly the Rambam whose statute religious code directly shaped and influenced Karo’s Shulkan Aruch. Qur’anists likewise differ among themselves over Arabic vocabulary, ritual practice, inheritance, criminal law, and the status of inherited Muslim practice; therefore a more accurate description of Munkir al-Ḥadīth/rejecters of hadith – scriptural primacy or scripturalist reconstruction, and not טיפש פשט pure literalism.

     Sunni authority, distributed among jurists, schools of law, hadith scholars, seminaries, judges, and local communities. Shiʿi Islam developed more concentrated forms of scholarly authority, especially around the imamate and later the marjaʿiyya; a high-ranking cleric – such as murdered Ali – recognized as a source of emulation and guidance for followers in matters of religious law and ethics. This institution plays a significant role in the socio-cultural and political landscape of Shia communities, particularly in Iran and Iraq.

     Karaism, this interfaith comparison validates their need to not simply reject Talmudic Oral-law logic, they like the Tzeddukim and Shomronim before them had to developed their own legal tradition. Wherein that sect had to develop some forms of communal custom, and interpreted the Hebrew T’NaCH (as opposed to the Shomronim who limited their sect to their version of the Torah text). Karaite readings of passages traditionally connected with tefillin and mezuzah reject the Torah concept of swearing a Torah oath or remembering the specifics of the oath sworn by the Avot wherein they alone father the Chosen Cohen people. Rather they treat them only as metaphors rather than accepting the Talmudic “theme” taught by means of precedent common law.

     The idea that Israel directly heard only the first two commandments is a rabbinic tradition used in an argument about the number 613; such as the Order of the Shemone Esrei 3 + 13 + 3 blessings – a רמז to 613 משל which teaches the שבת נמשל which interprets shabbat as week rather than a day of the week, based upon the kiddush sanctification of shabbat which 3 times emphasizes the איסר של מלאכה – a דיוק logical reasoning which contrasts עבודה. During the 6 days of Shabbat a bnai brit sanctifies מלאכה through wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna.

     The Shulkan Aruch like the Rambam statute law code failed to affix Gemarah halachic precedents to interpret the language of a specific Mishna. Both statute law codes prioritized simplification of religious observance over remembering the distinction between ארץ ישראל from g’lut. Moshe Rabbeinu took the 12 Tribes out of Egypt, his last mitzva while alive – he established the Capital Crimes small Sanhedrin Courts in three of the Cities of Refuge on the other side of the Jordan river. Contrast the 1648 false messiah narishkeit, where hoards of desperate Jewish communities believed that the Mitzva of Moshiach applicable to g’lut Jewry. The mitzva of Moshiach – the dedication of Yoval liberty for the 12 Tribal Republic through righteous Sanhedrin courtroom common law, dedicated to make fair compensation of damages as the tiqqun for ‘hatred without cause’ Av tuma avoda zarah.

     The common law Gemara routinely brings Tosefta as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of the language of a specific Mishna based upon a unique perspective; akin to different witness testimony to the New Moon. Hadith reports about Muhammad’s sayings, actions, approvals, biography, and sometimes legal judgments. They function similar but differently from the Tosefta common law בניני אבות precedents. Rather they function, at least to Sunni Muslims, as the principal means of knowing the Prophet’s Sunnah. Muhammad prioritizes faith in tawhid Allah whereas post Sinai/Horev the Book of דברים limits faith to the obligation to achieve judicial justice among the 12 Tribes within the borders/jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courtroom authority; hence תורה לא בשמים היא.

     Karaism like the Qur’anists sharply limit the Talmudic masoret as authoritive much akin to the Reform and still later Historical Conservative Judaism which view the Talmud as history rather than a vision of the future when a Sanhedrin court designates the Yichus of the 12 tribes within the borders of post ’67 and Oct 7th conquered Gaza – a definition of k’vanna of the mitzva of brit-melah, based upon the mussar as introduced in the NaCH Book of Yehoshua. Prophetic mussar shares no common ground with history. All generations to eternity obligated to grow prophetic mussar within their Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts. History by definition speculative and therefore irrelevant.

     Munkir al-Ḥadīth/Qur’anism, Karaism, and Protestant scripturalism – structurally analogous movements of scriptural primacy – each challenges the binding authority of the Oral Torah\פרדס interpretive judicial common law court Sanhedrin legal system as the establishment of faith, replaced by some substitute authority such as JeZeus as the 1st Sinai commandment God, or later Allah. Despite their cultural, historical institutions, doctrines, and political circumstances – substantially different – all embrace a Universal Monotheism which rejected the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment; both Moshe and Yehoshua sent as מלאכים to Egypt and Canaan to judge the Gods. This struggle defines the entire literature of the T’NaCH; do not worship other Gods understood as the Av tumah Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart – akin to Esav and Yaacov wrestling within the womb of Rivka metaphor.

     Munkir al-Ḥadīth simply not a unified denomination equivalent to Protestantism or Karaism. In common cultural contexts it functions as a polemical designation for people who reject, or sharply restrict, the authority of hadith. Modern Qur’anists differ considerably over ritual, law, inherited Muslim practice, and the use of hadith as historical evidence, much like modern Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism treatment of the Talmud.

     Sunni Islam, compares to the Chassidus of Brezlev, only Muhammad lives as their “Pope”. The analogy to the Protestant challenge to Catholic hierarchy works only at the level of resistance to inherited interpretive authority, not at the level of institutional structure. Shiʿism developed through disputes over succession, the authority of ʿAlī and his descendants, and later doctrines of the imamate. Karaism’s rejection of the Oral Torah revelation places them within the camps of Shomronim and Tzeddukim kapo-like מלשינים. The Hadith simply qualify as a broader category of reports concerning Muhammad’s sayings, actions, approvals, biography, and legal judgments. Respected by the Sunnis as the principal vehicle for knowing the Prophet’s Sunnah making them similar to that of the Tosefta.

     The Koran has no concept of ירידות הדורות, directly linked to g’lut. The idea that actions have downstream consequences akin to the ripples resultant from a rock cast into a pond. Post the public burning of all Talmudic hand written manuscripts in Paris, the supporters of the Rambam statute law code which divorced Gemarah halachic precedents as the means of interpreting the language of a specific Mishna based upon a fixed perspective and prioritized an assimilated Greek deductive reasoning logic. Later Islamic communities would likewise struggle with the influence of Greek philosophical schools. Muslim had no fall back logic system, like as did the Jewish kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning which separates the P’rushim who passed this masoret down to the rabbis – as recorded through the practice of lighting the Hanukkah lights which rejects Greek deductive logical reasoning as a kosher replacement of פרדס and rabbinic middot traditions of how to understand inductive reasoning in common law courtroom briefs based upon a comparison and contrast of precedents to the case currently heard before the Sanhedrin court.

     Post the Rambam “Civil War” all later commentaries written upon the common law codes of Rif, Rosh, and Tosafot commentary fail to treat this unique sh’itta of common law and pigeon hole all post Talmudic literature into the egg-crate block-headed box of static deductive logical reasoning.

     * EDITED BY KRISTI – PLEASE MAKE BOLD SO I CAN READ IT, I AM BLIND IN MY RIGHT EYE YE ALL ❤ ❤ ❤

     LikeLiked by 1 person

   • On the 5th Day of the Chag moed — a clarification resultant of Gamma Hans excellent questions

     As explained previously, the codification of the Mishna in 200, some say 210 CE roughly 75 years after the absolute disastrous defeat of Bar Kochba, where Rome renamed the conquered province Syria-Palestine. The Gemara sealed by Rav Ashi & Ravina in about 450 in Iraq; further editions made by the Sovariim scholars till about 600 CE! As such both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara more resemble Herzl’s “Jewish State”. No Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribe ever existed “historically”. Both king Shaul slaughtered the Kohonim of Nov as did king David ordered the death of Uriah – WITHOUT a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes trial. Hence neither king ever established Federal Sanhedrin common law legislative review of any and all statute law passed by Tribal authorities and/or the king of Jerusalem over a united 12 Tribe Republic.

     Torah common law in essence interpretive rather than historical! When Herzl wrote his definitive work of political Zionism, Jews had endured almost 2000 years of g’lut! Hence the same equally applies to the authorship of both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara! From beginning to end – post Shoah Israeli National Independence – both the Bavli Talmud and Herzl’s ‘The Jewish State’ do NOT refer to history but rather encompass an interpretive vision of the Jewish state in the future.

     As the T’NaCH engages in the history of kings, its foolish to assume that the T’NaCH primarily concerns historiography. T’NaCH prophets command mussar applicable to all generations of Bnai Brit Cohonim nationals ie the 12 Tribal yichus directly referenced in both the Torah and Book of Yehoshua. Confusing a secondary “detail” for the primary “k’vanna” amounts to confusion. Foreign invasions proved conclusively that prior to the people asking for a king in the Book of Shmuel, that the 12 tribes collectively as a whole ever enjoyed Yovel liberty based upon Moshe taking all Israel out of Egyptian slavery precedent.

     History serves as contexts to make a depth analysis interpretation. The Mongols destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate in Iraq in 1258, the king of France and Pope ordered the public burning of all Talmudic manuscripts within France in 1242 under Louis IX. The interpretation of history: both the Muslims and Jews, so to speak ‘Circled their Wagons’. Prior to the disaster to both separate societies: Muslim wisdom and knowledge served as the light and model to the rest of the primitive & barbaric European countries – stuck in the Dark Ages.

     After Rabbeinu Yonah realized that he had duplicated the exact same error as did the brothers dynastic dispute wherein the Romans occupied Jerusalem and appointed Herod ‘their’ king on that throne; Rabbeinu Yonah requested permission to burn Maimonidean works. Rabbinic g’lut Orthodoxy – unlike the P’rushim לשמה legalism – they thereafter embraced Greek schools of logic as kosher and therein blew out the Hanukkah lights. Despite assimilation to Greek culture, philosophy and logic – being a pig. Akin to Muhammad’s koran declared camels – clean! Furthermore, Rabbeinu Yonah profaned his public vow to visit the grave of Rambam.

     Almost all later Talmudic commentaries written AFTER Rabbeinu Yonah invalidated his נידוי, [[[the most notable exceptions being the Rosh common law codification of the Talmud and such as Hasdai Crescas Or Hashem]]], the public burning of all Talmud manuscripts from France and the later expulsion of all Jews from France in 1306, virtually ceased all opposition to Jews learning and copying Greek philosophical schools of logic – a direct Torah negative commandment which interprets Egypt and Canaan as לאו דוקא.

     The T’NaCH historical narratives serve as instruments of mussar, the oath brit sworn to and by the Avot defines t’shuva memory! Torah as a Constitutional document – NOT – a g’lut religious faith in some theologically constructed theology, such as Islam’s Tawhid Monotheism narishkeit. תורה לא בשמים היא the essential responsibility to rule the conquered land of Canaan through Sanhedrin common law legislative review of Tribal statute laws and some undefined Torah rhetoric “king” inclusive under the Torah Constitutional mandate which establishes משנה תורה courtroom authority has never yet occurred in any generation of the Jewish people to date.

     LikeLiked by 1 person

4. Good evening, Kristi. I hope you’re gotten satisfying and refreshing rest.

   I dicovered something old about “burnout”. It’s an old probl;em and the solution is known. It’s not necessarily easy, but it works. Especially if, as with you, a person has the Holy Spirit helping them. If it doesn’t apply to you, just ignore it. BNut this is a very Biblcal video!

   There’s another one (I’ve been on a voyage of discovery tonight) for hurting souls that I’ll e=send in a minute. If you know someone whos hurting. especially if they think they are themselves at fault, the next video will be good for that. There’s more to feeling crushed than we normally think about.

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply

5. We are allowed to complain to God! Bib lcal prrof that God doesn’t get angry when we complain! And it is helpful, when you are carrying a burdsen you think you can’t bear another minute. Again, this is a very Biblcal video:

   I hope someone here finds these videos helpful. Like most mature Christians, I have lived trough both of them, but I didn’t realize this is Biblcal.

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply

6. TODAH RABAH-THANK YOU LAWN IN JESUS-YESHUA CHRIST-MESSIAH NAME I PRAY AMEN ❤ AMEIN ❤

   MARANATHA-OUR LORD ( ADONAI ) COMETH!! ❤ AMEN ❤

   LOVE ❤ ALWAYS AND ❤ SHALOM, YSIC ❤

   KRISTI 1611 AV

   LikeLiked by 2 people

   Reply

7. Amen!🙏

   LikeLiked by 2 people

   Reply