( Psalms 46:10 KJV ) “BE STILL, and Know that I AM GOD: I WILL BE Exalted Among the heathen, I WILL BE Exalted in the Earth.”!!
GOODNIGHT YE ALL IN JESUS-YESHUA NAME I PRAY ❤ AMEN ❤ AMEIN ❤ MAZEL TOV ❤ SHALOM ( PEACE ) ❤ TODAH RABAH-THANK YOU ❤I UDATED THIS POST TODAY 6/16/2026 FOR YE ALL ❤ AMEN ❤ AMEIN ❤
I had a Stroke in my Brain from 2016, and it affected my right eye, I Still Cannot see out of MY RIGHT EYE very well, but so far I have too Trust in the LORD Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua!! IT’S 2026 AND I CANNOT SEE OF OF MY RIGHT EYE ANYMORE!! I NEED NEW GLASSES TOO SEE ON MY DESKTOP COMUTER NOW!! ❤ SO PLEASE PRAY FOR ❤ KRISTI ❤
LOVE❤ ALWAYS AND SHALOM ❤ YSIC ❤ KRISTI 1611 AV ❤
Rate this:
Please Share This Story Now on Your Sites Below as LORD Jesus-Yeshua Leads!!
7 thoughts on “BE STILL AND KNOW I AM YOUR TRUE GOD!!”
I UPDATED THIS POST TODAY 6/16/2026 IN JESUS-YESHUA NAME I PRAY AMEN ❤ AMEIN MAZEL TOV ❤ Shalom Aleichem ❤ Mazel Tov Everyone ❤ SELAH MARANATHA ❤ TODAH RABAH-THANK YOU ❤
❤ MARANATHA-OUR LORD COMETH-JESUS-YESHUA COMETH YE ALL ❤
Thank you for sharing the wonderful verse of 46:10 with us in a number of ways along with other scriptures. I always love your colorful posts, Kristi. Thank you and may God bless you!
If the NT fraud reduced to a single verse, how does that verse define the soul of the church to make ‘blood libel’ accusations that did not end with the shoah but continue with the Oct7th massacre on the last day of Chag Sukkot and UN ICJ and ICC blood libel slanders?
No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.
Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.
Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy.
No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.
Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.
Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy; if “all the prophets” really point to Jesus, then those who don’t accept that reading—Jews—can be cast as obstinate, blind, or guilty Christ-killers who bear the eternal mark of Cain. Acts 10:43 as the theological DNA that allows the church (and later, the mosque in its own way) to redefine Israel’s story, claim its prophets, and then accuse Israel of monstrous crimes when Jews refuse that redefinition.
Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church, based upon how the Torah defines soul. The precedent – brit cut between the pieces wherein an oath alliance sworn between partners wherein the Torah defines the “soul of Avram” through all his future born chosen Cohen seed who eternally inherit the lands of Canaan. Soul does not refer to present tense because Avram at the time of that oath alliance brit – childless. Therefore it seems to me that Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church and mosque abominations of av tuma avoda zarah because blood libels\לשון הרע define the behavior of the church in all generations.
This narrative involving Peter and Cornelius does not invoke the Avot in general or Avraham in particular. Its tumah soteriology theology, [“All the prophets testify about him” claims that the entire Tanakh in point of fact really all about Jesus. That’s a classic supersessionist move: Israel’s story is reinterpreted as prelude to the church.], completely and totally alien to the NaCH prophets. Hence its declaration utterly false on par with Muhammad another false prophet. Both abominations promote anti‑Jewish supersessionist theologies.
The Torah directly condemns false prophets, the gospel JeZeus converted by the Nicene Council into a God and unto a prophet by the Koran – both false books fail to define Prophet from the Torah. Neither Esav nor Yismael accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both employ “covenant” when that foreign term distorts brit as an oath alliance which requires שם ומלכות. The 1st commandment Sinai Name never once recognized not in the NT nor in the Koran. מלכות the code word for Oral Torah middot – which the church fathers throughout their history have publicly denied. Hence the confusion between t’shuva and repentance.
If brit is gutted, then t’shuva is gutted, and justice becomes secondary to belief. From there, it’s not a big leap to supersessionism: Esav and Yishmael claim the language of covenant while rejecting the actual revelation at Sinai and the Oral Torah that defines מלכות. Torah’s insistence on צדק צדק תרדוף and on t’shuva bound to brit – a direct challenge to any system that promises cheap grace while enabling deep injustice from generation to generation to generation.
The effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions in the Middle East, specifically contrasting UNIFIL’s performance in Lebanon with the earlier UNEF mission in Sinai and its perceived similarities to UNRWA. UNIFIL, like the 1956 UNEF force, lacks the teeth to remain when a host nation or powerful actor demands its departure—touches on the fundamental limitations of UN mandates. UN Secretary-General at the time, U Thant, immediately withdrew UNEF I as if Abdel Nasser determined its mandate, and directly contributed to the outbreak of the June ’67 War; no different from the ’39 White Paper directly contributed to the Nazi Shoah.
UNIFIL’s Mandate and Limitations shares this vulnerability but operates under a different, yet equally constrained, mandate. UNIFIL has historically avoided direct confrontation with Hezbollah. UNIFIL has effectively allowed Hezbollah to build up its arsenal right under its nose, similar to how UNEF was seen as powerless to stop Egyptian rearmament or military movements before 1967. The comparison to UNRWA often made in political discourse because both are criticized for operating in areas where they are accused of enabling non-state armed groups (Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza).
That the UN through UNRWA allowed Hamas to operate within its facilities and has failed to prevent the group’s rise in Gaza, effectively becoming a substitute for governance that allows Hamas to focus on military buildup. UNIFIL likewise duplicated the disgrace of UNWRA in Gaza. Both allowed Hezbollah and Hamas to operate within its patrolled domains right under their noses. Hence the analogy to the 1956 Sinai withdrawal apt and relevant like comparing church blood libels to Oct7th UN blood libels of genocide!
DEFUND UNRWANOWPLUS THE U.N WHO E.U. ICC AND WEF NOW, BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-ISRAEL-YISRAEL / ANTI-ZIOMISM / ANTI-CONSEVARTIVE JEWISH AND CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE /THEY’RE ANTISEMITIC / NO ANTISEMITISM AS IS IS HATEFUL OF JEWISH PEOPLE!!
Am Yisrael Chai ADONAI-the people of Israel live LORD MAZEL TOV!!
LOVE ❤ ALWAYS AND SHALOM, YSIC ❤
KRISTI
P.S. MAKE COMMENTS BOLD SO I CAN READ THEM, I AM BLIND IN MY RIGHT EYE YE ALL!! 😦
DEFUNDING “UNRAVFELED” AND THE UN IS WHAT WE SHOULD DO. I DOUBT IT WILL HAPPEN UNTIL KING JESUS RETURNS, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY PRAY FOR IT, AND PRAY FOR HIS RETURN.
“BE STILL AND KNOW THAT I AM GOD” IS A RECIPE FOR PEACE IN THE SOUL. THANK YOU FOR THE REMINDER, KRISTI !
I had a Stroke in my Brain from 2016, and it affected my right eye, I Still Cannot see out of MY RIGHT EYE very well, but so far I have too Trust in the LORD Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua!! IT’S 2026 AND I CANNOT SEE OF OF MY RIGHT EYE ANYMORE!! I NEED NEW GLASSES TOO SEE ON MY DESKTOP COMUTER NOW!! ❤ PLEASE PRAY FOR ❤ KRISTI ❤
Kristi Ann's Haven 
I UPDATED THIS POST TODAY 6/16/2026 IN JESUS-YESHUA NAME I PRAY AMEN ❤ AMEIN MAZEL TOV ❤ Shalom Aleichem ❤ Mazel Tov Everyone ❤ SELAH MARANATHA ❤ TODAH RABAH-THANK YOU ❤
❤ MARANATHA-OUR LORD COMETH-JESUS-YESHUA COMETH YE ALL ❤
GOD BLESS ❤ YOU ALL SELAH ❤ GOODNIGHT YAWN ❤
Love ❤ Always and Shalom ( Peace ) ❤ Everyone!! ❤ SELAH ❤
❤ Kristi ❤ 1611 AV ❤
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you for sharing the wonderful verse of 46:10 with us in a number of ways along with other scriptures. I always love your colorful posts, Kristi. Thank you and may God bless you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
If the NT fraud reduced to a single verse, how does that verse define the soul of the church to make ‘blood libel’ accusations that did not end with the shoah but continue with the Oct7th massacre on the last day of Chag Sukkot and UN ICJ and ICC blood libel slanders?
No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.
Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.
Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy.
No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.
Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.
Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy; if “all the prophets” really point to Jesus, then those who don’t accept that reading—Jews—can be cast as obstinate, blind, or guilty Christ-killers who bear the eternal mark of Cain. Acts 10:43 as the theological DNA that allows the church (and later, the mosque in its own way) to redefine Israel’s story, claim its prophets, and then accuse Israel of monstrous crimes when Jews refuse that redefinition.
Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church, based upon how the Torah defines soul. The precedent – brit cut between the pieces wherein an oath alliance sworn between partners wherein the Torah defines the “soul of Avram” through all his future born chosen Cohen seed who eternally inherit the lands of Canaan. Soul does not refer to present tense because Avram at the time of that oath alliance brit – childless. Therefore it seems to me that Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church and mosque abominations of av tuma avoda zarah because blood libels\לשון הרע define the behavior of the church in all generations.
This narrative involving Peter and Cornelius does not invoke the Avot in general or Avraham in particular. Its tumah soteriology theology, [“All the prophets testify about him” claims that the entire Tanakh in point of fact really all about Jesus. That’s a classic supersessionist move: Israel’s story is reinterpreted as prelude to the church.], completely and totally alien to the NaCH prophets. Hence its declaration utterly false on par with Muhammad another false prophet. Both abominations promote anti‑Jewish supersessionist theologies.
The Torah directly condemns false prophets, the gospel JeZeus converted by the Nicene Council into a God and unto a prophet by the Koran – both false books fail to define Prophet from the Torah. Neither Esav nor Yismael accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both employ “covenant” when that foreign term distorts brit as an oath alliance which requires שם ומלכות. The 1st commandment Sinai Name never once recognized not in the NT nor in the Koran. מלכות the code word for Oral Torah middot – which the church fathers throughout their history have publicly denied. Hence the confusion between t’shuva and repentance.
If brit is gutted, then t’shuva is gutted, and justice becomes secondary to belief. From there, it’s not a big leap to supersessionism: Esav and Yishmael claim the language of covenant while rejecting the actual revelation at Sinai and the Oral Torah that defines מלכות. Torah’s insistence on צדק צדק תרדוף and on t’shuva bound to brit – a direct challenge to any system that promises cheap grace while enabling deep injustice from generation to generation to generation.
The effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions in the Middle East, specifically contrasting UNIFIL’s performance in Lebanon with the earlier UNEF mission in Sinai and its perceived similarities to UNRWA. UNIFIL, like the 1956 UNEF force, lacks the teeth to remain when a host nation or powerful actor demands its departure—touches on the fundamental limitations of UN mandates. UN Secretary-General at the time, U Thant, immediately withdrew UNEF I as if Abdel Nasser determined its mandate, and directly contributed to the outbreak of the June ’67 War; no different from the ’39 White Paper directly contributed to the Nazi Shoah.
UNIFIL’s Mandate and Limitations shares this vulnerability but operates under a different, yet equally constrained, mandate. UNIFIL has historically avoided direct confrontation with Hezbollah. UNIFIL has effectively allowed Hezbollah to build up its arsenal right under its nose, similar to how UNEF was seen as powerless to stop Egyptian rearmament or military movements before 1967. The comparison to UNRWA often made in political discourse because both are criticized for operating in areas where they are accused of enabling non-state armed groups (Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza).
That the UN through UNRWA allowed Hamas to operate within its facilities and has failed to prevent the group’s rise in Gaza, effectively becoming a substitute for governance that allows Hamas to focus on military buildup. UNIFIL likewise duplicated the disgrace of UNWRA in Gaza. Both allowed Hezbollah and Hamas to operate within its patrolled domains right under their noses. Hence the analogy to the 1956 Sinai withdrawal apt and relevant like comparing church blood libels to Oct7th UN blood libels of genocide!
LikeLike
DEFUND UNRWA NOW PLUS THE U.N WHO E.U. ICC AND WEF NOW, BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-ISRAEL-YISRAEL / ANTI-ZIOMISM / ANTI-CONSEVARTIVE JEWISH AND CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE / THEY’RE ANTISEMITIC / NO ANTISEMITISM AS IS IS HATEFUL OF JEWISH PEOPLE!!
Am Yisrael Chai ADONAI-the people of Israel live LORD MAZEL TOV!!
LOVE ❤ ALWAYS AND SHALOM, YSIC ❤
KRISTI
P.S. MAKE COMMENTS BOLD SO I CAN READ THEM, I AM BLIND IN MY RIGHT EYE YE ALL!! 😦
LikeLiked by 3 people
DEFUNDING “UNRAVFELED” AND THE UN IS WHAT WE SHOULD DO. I DOUBT IT WILL HAPPEN UNTIL KING JESUS RETURNS, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY PRAY FOR IT, AND PRAY FOR HIS RETURN.
“BE STILL AND KNOW THAT I AM GOD” IS A RECIPE FOR PEACE IN THE SOUL. THANK YOU FOR THE REMINDER, KRISTI !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen! ♡ ❤ ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
I had a Stroke in my Brain from 2016, and it affected my right eye, I Still Cannot see out of MY RIGHT EYE very well, but so far I have too Trust in the LORD Christ-Messiah Jesus-Yeshua!! IT’S 2026 AND I CANNOT SEE OF OF MY RIGHT EYE ANYMORE!! I NEED NEW GLASSES TOO SEE ON MY DESKTOP COMUTER NOW!! ❤ PLEASE PRAY FOR ❤ KRISTI ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people